net/http is pretty much not good. Additionally, DNS behavior in ruby changes quite frequently.
I primarily want two things in both client and server operations:
Desired features:
For reference:
Reference: {FTW::Agent}
agent = FTW::Agent.new
request = agent.get("http://www.google.com/")
response = request.execute
puts response.body.read
# Simpler
response = agent.get!("http://www.google.com/").read
puts response.body.read
SPDY should automatically be attempted. The caller should be unaware.
I do not plan on exposing any direct means for invoking SPDY.
# 'http(s)' or 'ws(s)' urls are valid here. They will mean the same thing.
websocket = agent.websocket!("http://somehost/endpoint")
websocket.publish("Hello world")
websocket.each do |message|
puts :received => message
end
I have implemented a rack server, Rack::Handler::FTW. It does not comply fully with the Rack spec. See 'Rack Compliance Issues' below.
Under the FTW rack handler, there is an environment variable added, "ftw.connection". This will be a FTW::Connection you can use for CONNECT, Upgrades, etc.
There's also a websockets wrapper, FTW::WebSockets::Rack, that will help you specifically with websocket requests and such.
Due to some awkward and bad requirements - specifically those around the specified behavior of 'rack.input' - I can't support the rack specification fully.
The 'rack.input' must be an IO-like object supporting #rewind which rewinds to the beginning of the request.
For high-data connections (like uploads, HTTP CONNECT, and HTTP Upgrade), it's not practical to hold the entire history of time in a buffer. We'll run out of memory, you crazy fools!
Details here: https://github.com/rack/rack/issues/347
Here are some related projects that I have no affiliation with:
Given some of the above (especially the server-side stuff), I'm likely try and integrate with those projects. For example, writing a Faye handler that uses the FTW server, if the FTW web server even stays around.